Jack v. J. P. Harrison, Jr. & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting a motion to dismiss because, “[w]hile plaintiff posits that there was a ‘pattern’” of unconstitutional conduct, she did not “ple[a]d any facts that would demonstrate” the supposed pattern
• dismissing a section 1983 claim where the plaintiff “ha[d] not pointed to other complaints . . . or other lawsuits against the District based on similar . . . claims”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).