Jack v. Fritts

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a landlord owes no duty to a tenant’s social guest to protect that guest from third-party criminal conduct because such a duty is predicated on the existence of a landlord-tenant special relationship and the landlord and tenant’s social guest lack any such relationship
• holding that a landlord owes no duty to a tenant’s social guest to protect that guest from third-party criminal conduct because such a duty is predicated on the existence of a landlord-tenant special relationship and the landlord and tenant’s social guest lack any such relationship
• providing “[s]ince a tenant’s social guest is nothing more than a licensee, a landlord owes only the minimal duty of refraining from willfully or wantonly injuring the licensee”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).