Skip to main content
· 8/28/1995

Jack Randell v. United States

Citations

  • 64 F.3d 101
  • 76 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6147
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24344
  • 1995 WL 507562

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the intended effect of TEFRA was to avoid \duplication of administrative and judicial resources and inconsistent results between partners\
  • describing the goals of TEFRA and the problems TEFRA was intended to address
  • describing the goals of TEFRA and the problems TEFRA was intended to address
  • describing the goals of TEFRA and the problems TEFRA was intended to address
  • attorney’s affidavit that did not purport to be based on personal knowledge was inadequate to defeat a motion for summary judgment
  • “[W]e are precluded under TEFRA from examining a partnership item in an individual partner’s proceeding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meskill, Cardamone, Altimari

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.