· 8/28/1995
Jack Randell v. United States
Citations
- 64 F.3d 101
- 76 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 6147
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24344
- 1995 WL 507562
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the intended effect of TEFRA was to avoid \duplication of administrative and judicial resources and inconsistent results between partners\
- describing the goals of TEFRA and the problems TEFRA was intended to address
- describing the goals of TEFRA and the problems TEFRA was intended to address
- describing the goals of TEFRA and the problems TEFRA was intended to address
- attorney’s affidavit that did not purport to be based on personal knowledge was inadequate to defeat a motion for summary judgment
- “[W]e are precluded under TEFRA from examining a partnership item in an individual partner’s proceeding.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Meskill, Cardamone, Altimari
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.