Jack P. Racich and Gertrude C. Racich v. The Celotex Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ‘We agree that the multiple imposition of punitive damages for the same course of conduct may raise serious constitutional concerns, in the absence of a limiting principle.”
• “We agree that the multiple imposition of, punitive damages for the same course of conduct may raise serious constitutional concerns, in the absence of any limiting principle.”
• where party fails to object to purportedly improper remarks in closing argument, to be able to raise the issue on appeal it must show that the “remarks were so inflammatory as to constitute plain error”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).