Jack Mathes v. The Clipper Fleet, Etc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that examples of conduct submitted for the purpose of establishing habit must be \carefully scrutinized\ to ensure that they are numerous enough to justify an inference of systematic conduct
• noting that examples of conduct submitted for the purpose of establishing habit must be \carefully scrutinized\ to ensure that they are numerous enough to justify an inference of systematic conduct
• “The only relevant difference between the two theories is that the per se rule requires the plaintiff to prove causation whereas the Pennsylvania Rule shifts the burden of proof on causation to the defendant.”
• “The only relevant difference between the two theories is that the per se rule requires the plaintiff to prove causation whereas the Penn- sylvania Rule shifts the burden of proof on causation to the defendant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).