· 3/14/2013
Jack Ladd and Marie Ladd v. United States
Citations
- 110 Fed. Cl. 10
- 2013 U.S. Claims LEXIS 180
- 2013 WL 1069148
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- court looks to “the value of plaintiffs’ land . . . without easements – unencumbered property”
- Court looks to “the value of plaintiffs’ land . . . without easements – unencumbered property”
- The court looks to “the value of plaintiffs’ land . . . without easements—unencumbered property”
- Court looks to “the value of plaintiffs’ land . . . without easements – unencumbered property”
- The court looks to “the value of plaintiffs’ land . . . without easements—unencumbered property”
- “Plaintiffs’ reversionary interests are determined in this court by subtracting the value of plaintiffs’ land with easements for recreational trails, from their land without easements––unencumbered property.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hodges
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.