· 5/5/1977
JACK L. INSELMAN & CO., INC. v. FNB Fin. Co.
Citations
- 41 N.Y.2d 1078
- 41 N.Y. 1078
- 364 N.E.2d 1119
- 396 N.Y.S.2d 347
- 1977 N.Y. LEXIS 2119
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that defendant was entitled to summary judgment on tortious interference with contract claim because plaintiff failed to establish a breach of contract
- holding that defendant was entitled to summary judgment on tortious interference with contract claim because plaintiff failed to establish a breach of contract
- “In order for the plaintiff to have a cause of action for tortious interference of contract, it is axiomatic that there must be a breach of that contract by the other party.”
- “In order for the plaintiff to have a cause of action for tortious interference of contract, it is axiomatic that there must be a breach of that contract by the other party . . . .”
- affirming finding of no actual breach on summary judgment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke Concur in Memorandum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.