Jack Ingram Motors, Inc. v. Ward

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an arbitration provision that limited its scope to the buyer/lessor and dealer was not broad enough to cover nonsignatory Primus Automotive Financial Services, Inc.
• holding that an arbitration provision that limited its scope to the buyer/lessor and dealer was not broad enough to cover a nonsignatory
• opining that Section 16 was enacted in 1988 in response to a Supreme Court case holding that orders compelling or denying arbitration were not appealable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).