Jack in the Box, Inc. v. Skiles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a fast-food employer had no duty to warn an employee that it was obviously dangerous to use a ladder to climb over a lift gate
• reasoning that dangers associated with using ladder to climb over lift gate were obvious
• “The dangers associated with the use of a ladder to climb over a lift gate are common and obvious to anyone....”
• employer did not have duty to warn employee about obvious danger in using ladder to climb over delivery truck’s malfunctioning lift gate
• dangers associated with the use of a ladder to climb over a lift gate are common and obvious
• danger associated with using a ladder to climb over a lift gate was determined to be common and obvious

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).