Jack Fristoe v. Reynolds Metals Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that section 1446’s removal deadline is a mandatory claims-processing rule and that a party may waive objections to untimely removal by failure to timely 12 object
• holding that the 26 statutory time limit for removal “is mandatory[.]”
• noting that “the time limit is 26 || mandatory and a timely objection to a late petition will defeat removal”
• stating that “[m]ere omission of reference to LMRA § 301 in the complaint does not preclude federal subject matter jurisdiction” and recharacterizing a plaintiff’s complaint as one arising under § 301
• “[T]he time limit is mandatory and a timely objection to a late petition will defeat removal . . . .”
• “The statutory time limit for removal petitions is merely a formal and modal requirement and is not jurisdictional.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).