Jack E. Fields, Mary S. Fields, Martin Amundson v. Sarasota Manatee Airport Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that involuntary state plaintiffs may make a reservation of their federal taking claim in state court so as to later bring the claim in federal court
• “Attempting [silently to] reserve federal issues by failing to raise them in a state court complaint is clearly insufficient to preserve federal court review of unraised constitutional issues.”
• “[W]e conclude that the federal takings claim is essentially the same claim as that raised in the Florida law inverse condemnation action for purposes of applying Florida’s merger and bar rules.”
• Williamson that issue preclusion is also inapplicable is the better rule, County litigants “qualify for the exception to generally because the Kentucky Supreme Court did not decide any applicable res judicata principles”
• Pullman/England situation is an exception to full faith and credit requirements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).