Skip to main content
· 3/19/1992

Jack Delk v. Durham Life Insurance Company

Citations

  • 959 F.2d 104
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 4714
  • 1992 WL 51294

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering the applicability of the contra proferentem rule to hinge on whether the term remains ambiguous after application of rules of interpretation
  • construing ERISA plan’s ambiguities against the drafter as a last resort

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fagg, Beam, Gaitan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.