Jack D. Tiller v. Review Board of the Indiana Dept. of Workforce Development, IDWD U.I. Claims Adjudication, and the Town of Walkerton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding the Board did not abuse its discretion when it did not consider the claimant’s additional evidence
• concluding the Board did not abuse its discretion when it did not consider the claimant’s additional evidence
• holding that we had “no reason to assume the Board would have credited the additional evidence in 14 the same way [the claimant] does” and that the Board did not abuse its discretion when it did not consider the claimant’s additional evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).