JACK CIRRINCIONE and JULIE CIRRINCIONE v. DEUTSCHE BANK, N.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that entire, ongoing industry “must be regulated as a unit for conservation purposes”
• observing that regulatory commission had primary jurisdiction, with a special system of centralized judicial review
• permitting federal courts sitting in diversity jurisdiction to relinquish jurisdiction where a case involves complicated issues of state law
• abstaining where adjudication in federal court would unduly intrude into the processes of state government or undermine the state's ability to maintain desired uniformity
• concentrating judicial review in one forum aimed to “prevent the confusion of multiple review of the same general issues”
• administration of complicated state regulatory system should be left to state administrative bodies and courts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).