Jack Baker, Inc. v. Office Space Development Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an alleged oral contract was unenforceable when the party claiming it existed took “weeks before responding” to the subsequent written agree- ment and, when responding, “made several changes” to it
• explaining that for a contract to exist, the parties must agree to all of its material terms
• explaining that for a contract to exist, the parties must agree to all of its material terms
• commenting that under D.C. law “ ‘[f]or an enforceable contract to exist, there must be ... agreement as to all material terms’ ”
• describing requirement that Philippine embassy construction contract “will be subject to the approval of the Philippine Department of Foreign Affairs” as “striking” indication of nonfinality
• dismissing breach of contract claim where party asserting oral contract failed “to put forth sufficient evidence” of intention to be bound

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).