Skip to main content
· 9/9/2015

Jack Aronowitz v. Home Diagnostics, Inc., and Technical Chemicals & Products, Inc.

Citations

  • 174 So. 3d 1062
  • 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13497
  • 2015 WL 5240213

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that where an appellate court vacated a trial court’s judgment, the trial court’s judgment cannot be the basis for a collateral estoppel argument
  • stating that for collateral estoppel to apply, the specific issue must have been actually litigated and decided in a prior suit
  • “A trial court’s ruling concerning the application of res judicata and collateral estoppel is . . . reviewed de novo.”
  • for collateral estoppel-.to,apply, the specific issue must have been “actually litigated and decided in the former suit”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Klingensmith, Taylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.