Supreme Court of Connecticut· 11/16/1939
Jack and Jill, Inc. v. Tone
Citations
- 9 A.2d 497
- 126 Conn. 114
- 1939 Conn. LEXIS 247
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- right of discharge is strong indicator of master-servant relationship
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Maltbie, Hinman, Avery, Brown, Jennings
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Jones v. GoodsonTenth Circuit· 1941-06-23· cited 73×
- Beaverdale Memorial Park, Inc. v. DanaherSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1940-07-16· cited 57×
- Latimer v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-08-14· cited 43×
- Seals v. ZolloTennessee Supreme Court· 1959-07-27· cited 36×
- Birmingham v. BartelsEighth Circuit· 1947-01-06· cited 19×
- Bourgeois v. CacciapuotiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1951-11-06· cited 17×
- Kaliszewski v. Weathermaster Alsco Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1961-07-25· cited 14×
- Gagliano v. Advanced Specialty Care, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2018-08-14· cited 9×
- Kirby of Norwich v. Adm'r, Unemployment Comp. ActSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2018-01-31· cited 7×
- Galler v. SlurzbergNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1954-06-25· cited 5×
- Johnson v. Robertson Bleachery & Dye Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1950-05-31· cited 4×
- Walling v. McKayD. Nebraska· 1946-12-16· cited 3×
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Capitol Home Improvement Co.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1964-08-21· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.