Jack Allen v. City of Beverly Hills

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that futility supports a court’s decision to deny a motion for leave to amend
• stating that the court’s discretion 14 to deny leave to amend is “particularly broad where plaintiff has previously amended the 15 complaint.”
• holding district court did 15 not abuse discretion in denying leave to amend where movant presented only new legal 16 theories, not new facts
• stating that 14 leave to amend should be “freely given when justice so requires”
• setting forth standard of review and factors used to assess the propriety of a motion for leave to amend
• affirming a district court’s denial of leave to amend where plaintiff had previous 12 opportunities to cure defects

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).