Jack A. RUSH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARTIN PETERSEN COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing a \reasonable person\ finding for clear error because the date \the statute of limitations beg[ins] to run[] is a question of fact\
• claim based on broken oral promise was untimely because plaintiff learned he was enrolled in different retirement plan than promised more than three years before filing suit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).