Skip to main content
· 4/10/1997

Jablonski v. Rothe

Citations

  • 678 N.E.2d 1108
  • 287 Ill. App. 3d 752
  • 223 Ill. Dec. 100
  • 1997 Ill. App. LEXIS 201

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that one purpose of the doctrine of relation back is to “avoid elevating questions of form over questions of substance” in a way that precludes a consideration of the claims on the merits
  • rejecting a defendant’s argument that the amended complaint could not relate back to the original filing where no probate estate had been opened or administrator appointed at the time it was filed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McLAREN

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.