Skip to main content
· 1/16/1969

J. W. Baldridge v. United States of America and Donald B. Nettles, Special Agent of the Internal Revenue Service

Citations

  • 406 F.2d 526
  • 23 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 460
  • 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 9305

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determination regarding future admissibility of subpoenaed materials would be in the nature of an advisory opinion
  • Where appellant complied with the court order enforcing subpoena, “[t]here is nothing on this appeal for this Court to decide. The case is moot.”
  • appeal from district court order enforcing IRS subpoena became moot upon accountant for taxpayer’s compliance with the order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Aldrich, Godbold, Dyer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.