J. Sourini Painting, Inc. v. Johnson Paints, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that the issues on appeal could not be reviewed because the judgment contained inconsistent findings and arrived at conflicting conclusions
• “[B]ecause the trial court’s findings are contradictory and its legal conclusions inconsistent, we 7 vacate the judgment and the order and remand for a new trial on all issues.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).