Skip to main content
· 2/26/1903

J. S. Toppan Co. v. McLaughlin

Citations

  • 120 F. 705
  • 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 5303

Syllabus

<p>1. Contracts — Evidence as to Identity of Party.</p> <p>Where there is a direct conflict in the oral testimony of the parties who made a contract with respect to the party in whose behalf it was made, the correspondence between them both before and after it was made becomes of paramount importance, and, if pertinent, is controlling.</p> <p>2. Same.</p> <p>Evidence considered, and held to show that a license under a patent was granted to a partnership, and not to a corporation having the same •name, subsequently organized, so that the corporation could not maintain a suit thereon.</p>

Judges: Colt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.