J. S. Smith, Jr., & Co. v. Bowden
Citations
- 23 Fla. 150
Syllabus
<p>Judgments entered in the Circuit Court Clerk’s office on the same rule day under the practice act of 1873 (chapter 1938) are to be satis- „ fled pro rata out of the proceeds of property upon which writs of attachment have been levied, though such writs were issued and levied at different times or on different days anterior to such, judgment.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a statute regarding artificial insemination was inapplicable to case involving IVF
- concluding that a statute regarding artificial insemination was inapplicable to case involving IVF
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Raney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.