J & R MARKETING, SEP v. General Motors Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that registrants’ disclosure obligations under Section 11 include duty under Item 303 to make forward-looking projections regarding information known to registrant
• finding that if, prior to class certification the named plaintiffs’ individual claims fail, then dismissal is proper
• dismissing complaint where allegations demonstrated information was knowable, not known, to defendants, because “duty of disclosure arising from Item 303 does require knowledge”
• duty to disclose not properly alleged when plaintiffs fail to assert that trend was “known” by company
• “If it is found, prior to class certification, that the named plaintiffs’ individual claims are without merit, then dismissal is proper.”
• “If it is found, prior to class certification, that the named plaintiffs’ individual claims are without merit, then dismissal is proper.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).