J. Perez & Cia., Inc. v. United States of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that Rule 62(b) “as likely aimed at money judgments, the value of which can be calculated and secured with relative ease”
• stating that under federal rule 62, a case about “an agency’s suspension order . . . is more naturally viewed as a case involving an order to do, or not to do, something (that is, involving something like an injunction) rather than a case involving a money judgment”
• applying subsection (c) rather than subsection (d) to “[a] case in which a party seeks review of an agency’s suspension order, ... [because it] is more naturally viewed as a case involving an order to do, or not to do, something (that is, involving something like an injunction
• “Under Rule 62(d), a party taking an appeal from a money judgment rendered against him in a district court can stay proceedings to enforce that judgment pending appeal by furnishing a supersede-as bond.”
• “The right to obtain an automatic stay under Rule 62(d

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).