Skip to main content
· 11/5/1996

J. Paul Preseault v. United States

Citations

  • 100 F.3d 1525
  • 27 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20349
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 29066

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the “shifting use” argument and noting that “there are differences in the degree and nature of the burden imposed” from trail use

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.