Skip to main content
· 2/4/2000

J & P TRANSP., INC. v. Fidelity & Cas. Co.

Citations

  • 750 So. 2d 752
  • 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 988
  • 2000 WL 126392

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that sections 772.14 and 775.089(8) “estop a defendant from denying the essential elements of a crime in a subsequent civil .proceeding involving the same matters”
  • noting that the issue of liability in a civil theft action is properly decided by summary judgment when section 775.089(8) forms the basis of the motion for summary judgment
  • “In this case, the appellants argue Fidelity’s complaint for civil theft sought damages for the theft of insurance premiums, but the criminal charges concerned theft of insurance coverage.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: W. Sharp

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.