Skip to main content
· 7/26/2012

J. Michael Kummerer v. C. Richard Marshall

Citations

  • 971 N.E.2d 198
  • 2012 WL 3041441
  • 2012 Ind. App. LEXIS 350

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[t]he award of prejudgment interest is considered proper when the trier of fact does not have to exercise judgment in order to assess the amount of damages”
  • affirming the trial court’s denial of prejudgment interest where the trial court was required to use its judgment to assess damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vaidik, Crone, Bradford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.