J. M. Robinson, Norton & Co. v. Legrande

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that a “more relaxed standard . . . should apply in omission cases because a plaintiff cannot be required to specifically identify the precise time, place, and content of an event that did not occur”
• denying motion 17 to dismiss based on lack of pre-suit notice for New Mexico warranty claim because “a 18 factual issue exists as to the existence and adequacy of notice, the Court finds the issue ill- 19 suited for resolution under Rule 12(b).”
• agreeing MOORE V. MARS PETCARE US 19 Here, Plaintiffs’ complaint satisfies the Rule 9(b) heightened pleading standard in alleging the basic premise of “what is false or misleading about a statement, and why it is false.” Vess, 317 F.3d at 1106 (quotations omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).