J & L Diversified Enterprises, Inc. v. Municipality of Anchorage

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a prosecutor's coercion of a witness would violate a defendant's rights but would not give rise to tort liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983
• noting that a prosecutor's coercion of a witness would violate a defendant's rights but would not give rise to tort liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983
• holding that plain language of state statute, which stated that no action for damages could be brought against a municipality or any of its agents, officers, or employees if the claim is based on licensing, precluded action for damages against the Municipality of Anchorage
• holding that plain language of state statute, which stated that no action for damages could be brought against a municipality or any of its agents, officers, or employees if the claim is based on licensing, precluded action for damages against the Municipality of Anchorage
• an appellate court reviewing a dismissal on the pleadings must accept as true all well-pleaded allegations of fact contained in the appellant’s trial court pleadings
• \We will accept as true all well-pleaded material allegations of a non-moving party in our review of a dismissal on the pleadings.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).