J. Kenneth Brantley, Edgar v. Lewis, Craig R. Smith, and Garland P. Castleberry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting “the Ninth Circuit has held that a single letter was sufficient to allow review of alleged agency procedural defects”
• “FAA orders are not final and reviewable unless and until they impose an obligation, deny a right or fix some legal relationship as a consummation of the administrative process.” (cleaned up)
• allegations that defendants \conspired to present false accusations\ against plaintiff
• allegations that defendants “conspired to present false accusations” against plaintiff
• merits of plaintiffs Bivens 5 claims “inescapably intertwined” with review of the FAA’s order rescinding his Designated Pilot Examiner certificate, where consideration of plaintiffs claims would require review of merits and procedures surrounding the FAA’s order of rescission

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).