· 9/17/2010
J & J PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. Schmalz
Citations
- 745 F. Supp. 2d 844
- 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97443
- 2010 WL 3672336
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Nowhere in this language [of § 553(a)(1) ] is the term ‘cable operator’ qualified with language indicating that the cable operator must be an ‘authorized’ cable operator. We believe this to be a relevant distinction.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Timothy S. Hogan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.