Skip to main content
· 9/17/2010

J & J PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. Schmalz

Citations

  • 745 F. Supp. 2d 844
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97443
  • 2010 WL 3672336

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Nowhere in this language [of § 553(a)(1) ] is the term ‘cable operator’ qualified with language indicating that the cable operator must be an ‘authorized’ cable operator. We believe this to be a relevant distinction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Timothy S. Hogan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.