J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co. v. Buick Motor Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “we do not have the freedom to pick and choose which premises and conclusions we will follow”
• finding that the disqualification for a conviction of certain sexual offenses within the last five years is valid since the city officials' discretion is limited by objective criteria
• finding that because “none of the items in [the laundry list of unregulated activities] carries with it the same dan ger of crime and disease that the [regulated activities] do[,]” the ordinance was not impermissibly content based
• upholding six-foot buffer zone to more effectively enforce ban on contact between erotic dancers and audience members and to prevent occurrence of activities likely to result in criminal behavior or to prevent risk of disease
• upholding ordinance regulating activity that may occur in adult cabarets and bookstores
• setting out these requirements in the context of a licensing/permit scheme

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).