J. F. Wilcox & Sons v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the RUP A did not fundamentally alter the nature of liability for partners and partnerships
• noting that the court looks to equity and good conscience that calls for determinations dependent on the facts and circumstances of individual cases when considering joinder of a necessary party under CR 19
• noting that the court looks to equity and good conscience that calls for determinations dependent on the facts and circumstances of individual cases when considering joinder of a necessary party under CR 19
• title owner of mall was not necessary party in injured plaintiff's premises liability action
• “[T]he test in a premises liability action is whether one is the ‘possessor’ of property, not whether someone is a ‘true owner’ (the titleholder) of property.”
• title owner of mall was not necessary party in injured plaintiff’s premises liability action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).