J. E. Todd, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing a case in which the agency corrected an earlier mistake by issuing a binding memorandum instructing those charged with enforcing the regulation to forbear applying it in certain cases
• “Finding the amendment, as opposed to the rule, violated the APA’s procedural requirement—the Court set aside the amendment
• “[T]he ‘good cause’ exception is to be narrowly construed and only reluctantly countenanced.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “Petitioners have presented enough to show that on remand they can mount a credible challenge to the amended rule and were thus prejudiced by the absence of an opportunity to do so before the amendment.”
• \Petitioners have presented enough to show that on remand they can mount a credible challenge to the amended rule and were thus prejudiced by the absence of an opportunity to do so before the amendment.\
• good cause exception \should be limited to emer- gency situations\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).