J D v. R W

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[bjecause the Policy Requirement compels grantees to espouse the government’s position on a controversial issue, the district court did not abuse its discretion in preliminarily enjoining its enforcement pending a trial on the merits ”
• noting that “[b]ecause the Policy Requirement compels grantees to espouse the government’s position on a controversial issue, the district court did not abuse its discretion in preliminarily enjoining its enforcement pending a trial on the merits”
• noting that “[b]ecause the Policy Requirement compels grantees to espouse the government’s position on a controversial issue, the district court did not abuse its discretion in preliminarily enjoining its enforcement pending a trial on the merits”
• affirming grant of preliminary injunction enjoining government agencies from requiring non-governmental organizations to explicitly adopt statements opposing prostitution as a condition of receiving government funds
• affirming grant of preliminary injunction enjoining government agencies from requiring non‐governmental organizations to explicitly adopt statements opposing prostitution as a condition of receiving government funds
• “[Wjhere, as here, the government seeks to affirmatively require government-preferred speech, its efforts raise serious First Amendment concerns.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).