J. Cass v. UCBR

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “ ‘[Representations by counsel are not ‘evidence’ upon which an appellate court can rely when reviewing the findings of the trial court’ ”
• “[rjepresentations by counsel are not ‘evidence’ upon which an appellate court can rely when reviewing the findings of the trial court [emphasis in original; internal quotation marks omitted]
• ‘‘such discretion may be exercised as to amendments that involve matters pleaded in the complaint sought to be amended’’
• “[Representations by counsel are not evidence upon which an appellate court can rely when reviewing the findings of the trial court” [internal quotation marks omitted]; State v. Carsetti, 12 Conn. App. 375, 379, 530 A.2d 1095 (same
• “[Representations by counsel are not evidence upon which an appellate court can rely when reviewing the findings of the trial court” [internal quotation marks omitted]; State v. Carsetti, 12 Conn. App. 375, 379, 530 A.2d 1095 (same), cert. denied, 205 Conn. 809, 532 A.2d 77 (1987

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).