J. B. Ryer, Son & Co. v. United States
Citations
- 126 F. 246
- 1903 U.S. App. LEXIS 5166
Syllabus
<p>1. Customs Duties — Classification—Articles Made from Pile Fabrics— Construction of Proviso.</p> <p>Paragraph 315, Tariff Act July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 1, Schedule I, 30 Stat. 178 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1059], contains a provision for certain rates of duty on “plushes, velvets, velveteens, corduroys, and all pile fabrics, * * * composed of cotton or other vegetable fiber,” to which is added a proviso that “manufactures or articles in any form, * * * made or cut from plushes, velvets, velveteens, corduroys, or other pile fabrics composed of cotton or other vegetable fiber, shall be subject to the foregoing rates of duty and in addition thereto ten per centum ad valorem.” Held, that this proviso does not refer to any class of pile fabrics not included in the main provision.</p> <p>2. Same — Pile Fabrics of Flax.</p> <p>Held, that certain portieres, made from pile fabrics composed in chiet value of flax, are not included in the second proviso in paragraph 315. Tariff Act July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 1, Schedule I, 30 Stat. 178 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1659], relating to “manufactures or articles in any form * * * made or cut from * * * pile fabrics composed of cotton or other vegetable fiber.”</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing concern with early discovery related to downloading of pornographic works
- combining the Arista factors with other factors like abusive litigation tactics
- “the alleged infringer could be the subscriber, a member of his or her family, an employee, invitee, neighbor or interloper”
- “the alleged infringer could be the subscriber, a member of his or her family, an employee, invitee, neighbor or interloper”
- “the alleged infringer could be the subscriber, a member of his or her family, an employee, invitee, neighbor or interloper”
- “the alleged infringer could be the subscriber, a member of his or her family, an employee, invitee, neighbor or interloper”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.