J. Albert Lynch v. Town of Pelham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “an entity that holds the benefit of a covenant in gross can enforce it if it can establish a legitimate interest in enforcement”
• noting that the deed at issue “did not specify a means of enforcing the restrictive covenants, such as a right of re-entry or reverter”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).