Izykowski v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “only emails awaiting opening by the intended recipient” are covered
• finding that an employer “reading” an employee’s emails, “if proven to have occurred, [could be] ‘highly offensive’” (emphasis added)
• rejecting a motion to dismiss an intrusion claim in part because the emails at issue “were highly personal and private”
• rejecting a motion to dismiss an intrusion claim in part because the emails at issue “were highly personal and private”
• concluding opened e-mails are not in storage for backup protection
• agreeing with the defendants that the SCA covers only unopened emails but “draw[ing] a fair and plausible inference” that some emails were unopened

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).