Izer v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence from a laser-based speed detection device was inadmissible at trial as substantive evidence of a speeding offense because the evidence had not reached a scientific stage of verifiable certainty under the Harper standard
• conviction of speeding motorist based upon evidence from a laser speed detection device was reversed because the State failed to bring forth any expert testimony to establish that using laser-based devices to calculate vehicle speed had reached a scientific stage of verifiable certainty

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).