Iyer v. Everson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[O]ther than [plaintiff’s] own speculation, there is no indication that [his supervisor’s] conduct was in any way linked to [plaintiff’s] sex. Therefore, [plaintiff’s] claim of quid pro quo sexual harassment is dismissed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).