Skip to main content
· 2/15/1991

Iwatsu Elec. Co., Ltd. v. United States

Citations

  • 758 F. Supp. 1506
  • 15 Ct. Int'l Trade 44
  • 15 C.I.T. 44
  • 13 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1120
  • 1991 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 14

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the “statutory language does not ... require that ITC demonstrate that dumped imports, through the effects of particular margins of dumping, are causing injury.”
  • questioning whether causation may ever be proven by volume data alone
  • “Difficulties with, or even impossibility of, direct price comparison do not mandate a negative determination.”
  • ITC examines the effects ofimports in a class of merchandise sold at LTFV on the domestic industry producing the “like product”; also recognizingITC’s two-step approach
  • upholding use of imperfect data as trend indicator
  • upholding use of imperfect data as trend indicator

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Restani

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.