Skip to main content
· 9/29/2010

Ivy v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

Citations

  • 378 S.W.3d 234
  • 2010 Ark. App. 645
  • 2010 Ark. App. LEXIS 674
  • 2010 WL 3770735

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that protection of these rights is the \primary purpose\ of Labor Code sections 417.001 (subrogation) and 417.002 (reimbursement)
  • noting that “[u]ndefined terms in a statute are typically given their ordinary meaning [unless] a different or more precise definition is apparent from the term’s use in the context of the statute” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Abramson, Agree, Gladwin, Glover

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.