Ivrin Bolden, Jr. v. Warden, West Tennessee High Security Facility

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that \[a] primary concern of the Supreme Court in Ashe was the prosecution's use of the first trial as a `dry run' for the second prosecution\
• noting that \[a] primary concern of the Supreme Court in Ashe was the prosecution's use of the first trial as a 'dry run' for the second prosecution\
• “To determine the facts necessarily decided in [a defendant’s] first trial under the first step of the collateral estoppel analysis, [a court] must examine the elements of the statutes under which [the defendant] was charged.”
• “To determine the facts necessarily decided in [a defendant’s] first trial under the first step of the collateral estoppel analysis, [a court] must examine the elements of the statutes under which [the defendant] was charged.”
• “To determine the facts necessarily decided in [a defendant’s] first trial under the first step of the collateral estoppel analysis, [a court] must examine the elements of the statutes under which [the defendant] was charged.”
• “To determine the facts necessarily decided in [a defendant’s] first trial under the first step of the collateral estoppel analysis, [a court] must examine the elements of the statutes under which [the defendant] was charged.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).