Skip to main content
· 9/14/1982

Ivey v. Scoggins

Citations

  • 295 S.E.2d 164
  • 163 Ga. App. 741
  • 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 2634

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the foreign object exception applies where a single physician placed and left a foreign object in the patient’s body during treatment; physician may be charged with actual' knowledge
  • holding that when a doctor conducting a surgical procedure negligently and inadvertently placed and left a suture in an organ not involved in the procedure, the suture was a “foreign object” under OCGA § 9-3-72
  • suture necessitated removal of left kidney

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pope, Deen, Sognier

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.