Skip to main content
· 9/8/1989

Iverson v. Xpert Tune, Inc.

Citations

  • 553 So. 2d 82
  • 1989 Ala. LEXIS 635
  • 1989 WL 122584

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming the trial court's dismissal of Iverson's claim for willful spoliation of evidence, but stating \we are not to be understood as specifically holding that Iverson is guilty of intentionally or deliberately destroying evidence\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Houston

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.