Iverson v. McDonnell
Citations
- 36 Wash. 73
- 78 P. 202
- 1904 Wash. LEXIS 517
Syllabus
<p>Trial — Instructions—Pleadings—Amendments Deemed to be Made — Master’s Promise to Repair Machinery. Instructions upon an issue as to defendant’s promise to repair machinery not raised in the pleadings, are not erroneous where evidence thereon was introduced without objection, since the pleadings may be considered amended to embrace the fact.</p> <p>Master and Servant — Negligence- — Indemnity—Pact That Defendant Carries Accident Insurance — Trial—Objections— Sufficiency. In an action against an employer for personal injuries, where it is evident that the purport of questions asked by the plaintiff’s counsel was to get before the jury the fact that the defendant was indemnified against liability by carrying employer’s liability insurance, the case will be reversed, although defendant’s first objection to such questions specified no grounds and the second objection made was sus'tained.2</p>
Judges: Dunbab
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.