Iverson v. Atlas Pacific Engineering

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that allegations that an employer failed to “criticize, censure, terminate, suspend or otherwise sanction or take any action against [the employee]” were sufficient to allege ratification
• “Where, as here, intentional physical acts, ratified by the employer, allegedly cause non-compensable harm primarily emotional in nature, we conclude that the exclusive remedy provisions do not preclude civil claims.”
• “Where, as here, intentional physical acts, ratified by the employer, allegedly cause noncompensable harm primarily emotional in nature, we conclude that the exclusive remedy provisions do not preclude civil claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).